Briem’s notes on type design: Character width¶
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab70/7ab7031a691206575a799da746bf1f6d8b76e3dd" alt=""
Next to each other, these four letters look awkward. The letter o is too narrow, the letter n rather wide, and the letter e far too wide. They can be put right.
Let’s tackle the letter o first. Here’s a test.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95b18/95b1866b1a90ae3ae1211ccbf68ff619b3166666" alt=""
In these four lines, only the letter o is different. How wide should it be? The letter o in the top line is too narrow. It’s too wide in the bottom line. The second from the top looks all right to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92244/92244d37664e22ee990a3386762b069ae0d84f24" alt=""
Here only the letter n is different. In the top line it is too narrow, and it’s too wide in the bottom line. (This is easy, believe me. You make a few blends and line them up.) The third from the top will do.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/008fa/008fab67e2f875be949275dd573ae41a76556b86" alt=""
The top letter e is too narrow and the bottom letter e too wide. The second from the top looks fine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ab70/7ab7031a691206575a799da746bf1f6d8b76e3dd" alt=""
Before: We started out with bad letter widths.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b35b5/b35b504d9c7082f37cb7b849e123ba3dbb454317" alt=""
After: Now these four look all right together.
Four letters are a small sample, I know. But when you’ve got the letter b, the letters p d q are taken care of. With the letter n come the letters h m u. The alphabet is made of recurring shapes.
Run a few tests. You’ll like them.
Notes on type design. Copyright © 1998, 2001, 2022 Gunnlaugur SE Briem. All rights reserved. Republished with permission in 2022 by Fontlab Ltd.